Naysayers you all.

Calling us blawgers…or worse.

Nothing productive will come of all that time you spend in grandiose self-promotion. Wait, isn’t all self-promotion inherently grandiose?

But now, after 622 posts, 2052 comments and 1818 tweets, I finally have something to show for it.

Did you know the press get free coffee and food? And it’s pretty good.

I just so love new adventures. The thing is, after I signed up and finished my first my bike race, I called myself a bike racer. That’s quite debatable.

Don’t worry, I promise not to call myself a journalist or writer. I’ll just stay a blawger.

JMM

P.S. This would be a great time to thank the many real writers and journalists that have helped (and help) me along the way. You know who you are. Thanks so much.

 

{ 1 comment }

This will have to be a short one tonight. I’m getting ready to unleash a fury of words and opinions on matters of the heart rhythm.

A respite now.

I came across this highly tweeted piece on how much salary we require to be happy. It turns out that 50,000$ per year acts as a happiness pivot point. Making more than 50k does not seem to increase perceived happiness.

As for you all, I can’t say, but I’d surely be happier with more watts than dollars any day. Imagine the sensations of holding 400 watts for longer than a few minutes. Call that bliss. Seriously, what would you trade for a few extra dollars–watts for sure, more success at ablation, good health, fewer bike crashes, patience, grace, the memory to pick up stuff after using it. Wait, I had better stop.

One more happy thing: more readers!

Okay…I’m getting back to work. HRS is in full swing. Look for posts tomorrow over at Trials & Fibrillations.

I learned a ton today. I had a nice dinner with two of my electrophysiology teachers. Gosh, I owe those two so much.

JMM

{ 2 comments }

Hi All,

Tomorrow morning, I will be heading to Boston for the annual Heart Rhythm Society scientific sessions.

As I did this January during the Boston AF symposium, I plan to keep you informed. In fact, in my new capacity as a member of theHeart.org team, I will be live tweeting and blogging the meeting.

I will use twitter to provide a live ‘feel’ of the meeting–as seen and filtered through my nervous system. I will also attempt to type up brief thoughts on important sessions. I won’t cover the stories as a journalist would, but rather with my personal take on how a session fits into the real world of clinical medicine and EP.

My twitter name is @drjohnm

The hashtag for the meeting is #HRS2012.

The link to my blog posts are here: Trials and Fibrillation blog on theHeart.org

JMM

{ 0 comments }

I’m sorry.

The news was really bad today. I wished it were better. (Well, maybe I don’t.)

The easy-answer people were denied again. Punched in the gut, were they.

The notion that a pill can do what exercise does remains a fantasy.

Another member of the group of drugs that boost HDL, called CETP inhibitors, was abandoned. As reported today on theHeart.org, Roche pharmaceuticals terminated development of its once promising HDL-booster, dalcetrapib.

Why? Because it did not work. Though the drug lowered inflammation in carotid arteries, improved levels of bio-markers and modestly raised HDL, an interim analysis of a study showed it had no effect on outcomes. Smart people say the drug lacked efficacy. At least it performed better than its predecessor, torcetrapib—another HDL-boosting CETP inhibitor that was abruptly pulled from the market in 2006 because it increased stroke and death rates.

The shape we are all in, I can see why drug companies desire a pill that could raise HDL (the good cholesterol) and reduce the risk of heart attacks. That’s one heck of a promising profit stream.

But…Come on. Thus far, the only safe and proven effective way to increase HDL and decrease heart events is something along these lines. (Fancy German computer not required.)

A half hour spin through the park

When I am finally wrong about pills doing what (normal) life should do, I’ll admit it. For now, we aren’t there yet.

That’s not to say companies like Lilly and Merck are throwing in the towel. Merck has pinned its hopes on anacetrapib—a pacman-like pill that some have likened to liquid plumber. (Warning: This link goes to a 2010 post of mine–that was before I knew about things like action verbs and not using the passive voice.) Even this pill skeptic has to admit that anacetrapib looks remarkable: it moves HDL up dramatically and it does not seem to make people worse. Anacetrapib is currently being studied in a major phase III clinical trial called REVEAL.

We shall see. As a heart doctor, I root for better therapies. But part of me (secretly) hopes the swallowing-pill thesis fails. A sad day it would be indeed, if word gets out there that heart health can be had with a pill.

Of course, even if anacetrapib proves better than its two predecessors, which would not be that hard, we can criticize REVEAL investigators for leaving out the most important comparison group: those who exercised each day and ate a plant-intensive low-calorie diet.

Stay tuned. But in the meantime, stay on your bike or in your running shoes, or even..in your Speedo?

JMM

{ 9 comments }

New Trials and Fibrillations post is up

May 6, 2012 Athletic heart

It’s entitled: More on ECG screening to prevent sudden death in the young: On risk, the Italian experience and notes from the real world. Here’s the lead in… Earlier this week, I wrote about one of my favorite topics in medicine: the ECG. This 12-pronged view of cardiac vectors catapulted my interest in the human [...]

Read the full article →

Is Pradaxa a bad drug?

May 4, 2012 Atrial fibrillation

It’s crazy out there in blood thinner land. The novel blood thinning drug for patients with atrial fibrillation, Dabigatran (Pradaxa) cannot get a break. It’s all over the TV: Pradaxa = Bad Drug. Look at this image: Today, on the prestigious heart news site, theHeart.org, an insignificant 113-patient study presented as a poster at a [...]

Read the full article →